Rejecting Geothermal Projects: Muslim Environmentalism in The SAPAR Movement for Ecological Justice and Sustainable Natural Resources

Keywords

Geothermal
Muslim Environmentalism
SAPAR Movement
Green Energy
Ecological Justice

How to Cite

Muizudin, M. (2025). Rejecting Geothermal Projects: Muslim Environmentalism in The SAPAR Movement for Ecological Justice and Sustainable Natural Resources. Studia Islamika, 32(3), 521–552. https://doi.org/10.36712/sdi.v32i3.46663

Abstract

This study investigates the Syarekat Perjuangan Rakyat Padarincang (SAPAR) movement, which resists a geothermal project on Mount Parakasak, Banten, through the lens of Muslim environmentalism. The project provoked strong opposition due to concerns that water scarcity would threaten agriculture and socio-religious life, underscoring the community’s inseparable relationship with nature. Using a qualitative case study approach, the research draws on online reports, journal articles, and documentary videos to analyze SAPAR’s resistance strategies. Findings reveal that SAPAR operationalizes principles of Islamic environmental ethics, such as khalīfah, amānah, and mīzān, into collective action, framing environmental stewardship as both an ethical and cultural imperative. Religious rituals such as tahlilan and istighosah function as instruments of protest, demonstrating the religious, social, and political engagement. The movement’s discourse reflects a hybridization of Islamic values and local ecological knowledge, challenging dominant “green energy” narratives. This study underscores the need for inclusive policies that prioritize ecological justice and recognize local communities as key actors in sustainable resource governance.
https://doi.org/10.36712/sdi.v32i3.46663

References

Adi, Agus Cahyono. 2024. “Kementerian ESDM Kejar Tambahan 90 MW Dari Panas Bumi.” ESDM. https://www.esdm.go.id/id/media-center/arsip-berita/kementerian-esdm-kejar-tambahan-90-mw-dari-panas-bumi- (June 20, 2025).

Adityatama, Daniel, Mukhamad Umam, Dorman Purba, and Farhan Muhammad. 2019. “Review on Geothermal Direct Use Application as an Alternative Approach in Community Engagement at Early Exploration Phase in Indonesia.”

Almujaddidy, Ali Ilham. 2021. “„Progressive Muslim Environmentalism: The Eco-Theology and Ethics of the Nahdliyyin Front For Sovereignty over Natural Resources (FNKSDA).“.” Varieties of Religion and Ecology: Dispatches from Indonesia: 9–32.

Anggreta, Dian Kurnia, Gumilar Rusliwa Somantri, and Semiarto Aji Purwanto. 2022. “Social Acceptance: Mapping the Perspectives of Stakeholder in the Development of Geothermal Power Plants in West Sumatra, Indonesia.” International Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning 17(4).

Bagir, Zainal Abidin. 2015. “The Importance of Religion and Ecology in Indonesia.” Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology 19(2): 99–102.

Bagir, Zainal Abidin, and Najiyah Martiam. 2016. “Islam: Norms and Practices.” In Routledge Handbook of Religion and Ecology, Routledge, 79–87.

Baxter, Brian. 2004. A Theory of Ecological Justice. Routledge.

Berry, Evan. 2022. “The Right Climate: Political Opportunities for Religious Engagement with Climate Policy.” Climate politics and the power of religion: 122–46.

Blommaert, Jan, and Chris Bulcaen. 2000. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” Annual review of Anthropology 29(1): 447–66.

BPS. 2024. “Population by District and Religion in Serang Regency - Statistical Data.” https://serangkab.bps.go.id/en/statistics-table/2/MTcwIzI=/jumlah-penduduk-menurut-kecamatan-dan-agama-yang-dianut-di-kabupaten-serang.html (June 23, 2025).

CELIOS-WALHI. 2024. Geothermal di Indonesia: Dilema Potensi dan Eksploitasi atas Nama Transisi Energi. https://www.walhi.or.id/uploads/buku/ID%20CELIOS%20x%20WALHI%20Geothermal%202024.pdf.

Dhar, Amalesh, M Anne Naeth, P Devereaux Jennings, and Mohamed Gamal El-Din. 2020. “Geothermal Energy Resources: Potential Environmental Impact and Land Reclamation.” Environmental Reviews 28(4): 415–27.

Dien, Mawil Izzi. 2003. “Islam and the Environment: Theory and Practice.” Islam and Ecology: A Bestowed Trust,. Harvard: the President and Fellows of Harvard College.

Fadhillah, Ferdino R, M Rizqi Al Asyari, Adika Bagaskara, Dies Valley Vie Vanda, Daniel W Adityatama, Dorman Purba, Respati Katmoyo, Ajarani Djandam, and Linda Gurning. 2022. “Challenges in Getting Public Acceptance on Geothermal Project in Indonesia.”

Fairclough, Norman. 2013. Language and Power. London and New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315838250.

Foltz, Richard C. 2003. “Islamic Environmentalism: A Matter of Interpretation.” Islam and Ecology: A Bestowed Trust. Harvard: the President and Fellows of Harvard College.

Fox, Nick J, and Pam Alldred. 2019. “New Materialism.” SAGE Research Methods Foundations: 1–16.

Gade, Anna M. 2019. Muslim Environmentalisms: Religious and Social Foundations. Colombia: Columbia University Press.

Gamble, Christopher N, Joshua S Hanan, and Thomas Nail. 2019. “What Is New Materialism?” Angelaki 24(6): 111–34.

Gottlieb, Roger S. 2006. The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Ecology. OUP USA.

Greiner, Clemens, Britta Klagge, and Evelyne Atieno Owino. 2023. “The Political Ecology of Geothermal Development: Green Sacrifice Zones or Energy Landscapes of Value?” Energy Research & Social Science 99: 103063.

Griebler, Christian, Heike Brielmann, Christina M Haberer, Sigrid Kaschuba, Claudia Kellermann, Christine Stumpp, Florian Hegler, et al. 2016. “Potential Impacts of Geothermal Energy Use and Storage of Heat on Groundwater Quality, Biodiversity, and Ecosystem Processes.” Environmental Earth Sciences 75: 1–18.

Hart, John. 2017. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Religion and Ecology. John Wiley & Sons.

Hermanto, Agus, and Laser Narindro. 2019. “New Geothermal Law and Its Implications for Geothermal Development in Indonesia.” International Journal of Law and Management 61(1): 2–16.

Jenkins, Willis. 2009. “Ecological Management, Cultural Reform, and Religious Creativity.” Union Seminary Quarterly Review 63(1–2): 1–17.

Jenkins, Willis. 2016. “Whose Religion? Which Ecology?: Religious Studies in the Environmental Humanities.” In Routledge Handbook of Religion and Ecology, Routledge, 22–32.

Jenkins, Willis, Mary Evelyn Tucker, and John Grim. 2016. Routledge Handbook of Religion and Ecology. Routledge New York.

Koehrsen, Jens. 2021. “Muslims and Climate Change: How Islam, Muslim Organizations, and Religious Leaders Influence Climate Change Perceptions and Mitigation Activities.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 12(3): e702.

Koehrsen, Jens, Julia Blanc, and Fabian Huber. 2022. “How ‘Green’ Can Religions Be? Tensions about Religious Environmentalism.” Zeitschrift für Religion, Gesellschaft und Politik 6(1): 43–64.

Latour, Bruno. 2012. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Univ. Press.

Mabry, Linda. 2008. “Case Study in Social Research.” The SAGE handbook of social research methods 1: 214–27.

Mangunjaya, Fachruddin Majeri, and Jeanne Elizabeth McKay. 2012. “Reviving an Islamic Approach for Environmental Conservation in Indonesia.” Worldviews 16(3): 286–305.

Meyer, David S, and Debra C Minkoff. 2004. “Conceptualizing Political Opportunity.” Social forces 82(4): 1457–92.

Muslihudin, Muslihudin, Imam Santosa, Elly Tugiyanti, Suyono Suyono, Prita Sari Dewi, and Joko Santoso. 2023. “The Urgency of Social Aspects in Environmental Assessment: A Case Study of a Sustainable Geothermal Power Plant Development in Banyumas, Indonesia.” Environmental Research, Engineering and Management 79(2): 88–98.

Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. 2001. Islam and the Plight of Modern Man. Rev. and enl. ed. [Place of publication not identified], Chicago: ABC International Group ; Distributed by KAZI Publications.

Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. 2003. “Islam, the Contemporary Islamic World and the Environmental Crisis.” Islam and Ecology: A Bestowed Trust. Harvard: the President and Fellows of Harvard College.

Nixon, Rob. 2011. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Harvard University Press.

Okyere-Manu, Beatrice, Stephen Nkansah Morgan, and Ovett Nwosimiri. 2022. “Cultural, Ethical, and Religious Perspectives on Environment Preservation.” Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 85: 94–104.

Permatasari, Anggi. 2024. “Tanggung Jawab Dan Perlindungan Negara Atas Hak-Hak Sosial Ekonomi Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam Menurut Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.” Jurnal Kewarganegaraan 8(1): 272–89.

Peterson, Anna L. 2001. Being Human: Ethics, Environment, and Our Place in the World. Univ of California Press.

Raissa, Anggita. 2025. “‘Tiap Beko Datang, Kami Adang’: Perempuan Padarincang Melawan Proyek Geothermal Banten.” Project Multatuli. https://projectmultatuli.org/tiap-beko-datang-kami-adang-perempuan-padarincang-melawan-proyek-geothermal-banten/ (December 10, 2025).

Renoth, Robin, Elmar Buchner, Martin Schmieder, Maximilian Keim, Manfred Plechaty, and Michael Drews. 2023. “Social Acceptance of Geothermal Technology on a Global View: A Systematic Review.” Energy, Sustainability and Society 13(1): 49.

Rizki, Muhamad. 2024. “Perjalanan Panjang Rakyat Padarincang Tolak PLTPB dari Istigosah hingga Mimbar Bebas, Berhasil Usir Proyek Geothermal dari Bumi Padarincang.” Bantencorner.com. https://bantencorner.com/2024/03/07/perjalanan-panjang-rakyat-padarincang-tolak-pltpb-dari-istigosah-hingga-mimbar-bebas-berhasil-usir-proyek-geothermal-dari-bumi-padarincang/ (June 21, 2025).

Saniotis, Arthur. 2012. “Muslims and Ecology: Fostering Islamic Environmental Ethics.” Contemporary Islam 6(2): 155–71.

Saryani, Yayan, Naniek Afrilla Framanik, and Ail Muldi. 2023. “Komunikasi Pemangku Kepentingan dalam Konflik Proyek Geothermal di Desa Batukuwung, Kabupaten Serang.” JRK (Jurnal Riset Komunikasi) 14(1): 110–28.

Saturi, Sapariah. 2024. “Mau Hidup Tenang, Masyarakat Padarincang Tolak Proyek Geothermal.” Mongabay.co.id. https://mongabay.co.id/2024/06/19/mau-hidup-tenang-masyarakat-padarincang-tolak-proyek-geothermal/ (June 16, 2025).

Saunders, Clare. 2013. Environmental Networks and Social Movement Theory. Bloomsbury Academic.

Shortall, Ruth, Brynhildur Davidsdottir, and Guðni Axelsson. 2015. “Geothermal Energy for Sustainable Development: A Review of Sustainability Impacts and Assessment Frameworks.” Renewable and sustainable energy reviews 44: 391–406.

Smith, Jonathan Davis, Ronald Adam, and Samsul Maarif. 2024. “How Social Movements Use Religious Creativity to Address Environmental Crises in Indonesian Local Communities.” Global Environmental Change 84: 102772.

Spellman, Frank R. 2024. The Science of Green Energy. Yogyakarta: CRC Press.

Spijkerboer, Rozanne C, Ethemcan Turhan, Andreas Roos, Marco Billi, Sofia Vargas-Payera, Jose Opazo, and Marco Armiero. 2022. “Out of Steam? A Social Science and Humanities Research Agenda for Geothermal Energy.” Energy Research & Social Science 92: 102801.

Strang, Veronica. 2019. “The Rights of the River: Water, Culture and Ecological Justice.” In Conservation: Integrating Social and Ecological Justice, Springer, 105–19.

Sukmawan, Asep. 2018. “Kebijakan Pemerintah Dan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Pembangunan Listrik Tenaga Panas Bumi: Studi Kasus Padarincang, Banten.” Logika: Jurnal Penelitian Universitas Kuningan 9(02): 57–64.

Sulistiani, Selvi, and Ika Arinia Indriyany. 2024. “Ecofeminism: Women’s Resistance to the Development of a Geothermal Power Plant Project in Padarincang, Serang Regency.” Government & Resilience 2(2): 63–76.

Sulistyaningrum, Dyah, and Gilang Ramadhan. 2023. “Sapar Alliance Movement (Syarekat Perjuangan Rakyat) Against Geothermal Project In Padarincang Prakasak Mountain.” Journal of Social Politics and Governance (JSPG) 5(1): 25–37.

Tama. 2023. “Masyarakat Padarincang Tegas Menolak Proyek Panas Bumi - TitikKata.com - Referensi Kita.” TitikKata.com. https://titikkata.com/masyarakat-padarincang-tegas-menolak-proyek-panas-bumi (June 16, 2025).

Tangwa, Godfrey B. 2005. “Some African Reflections on Biomedical and Environmental Ethics.” A Companion to African philosophy: 387–95.

Times Indonesia. 2023. “Tolak Geothermal, Masyarakat Padarincang Gelar Istighosah dan Doa Bersama.” TIMES INDONESIA. https://www.times.co.id/tolak-geothermal-masyarakat-padarincang-gelar-istighosah-dan-doa-bersama (December 10, 2025).

Tomalin, Emma. 2024. “Politics.” In Grounding Religion. A Field Guide to the Study of Religion and Ecology. (Ch. 18, pp. 263-278).

Trisiah, Anita, Gerdien de Vries, and Hans de Bruijn. 2022. “Framing Geothermal Energy in Indonesia: A Media Analysis in a Country with Huge Potential.” Environmental Communication 16(7): 993–1001.

Tucker, Mary Evelyn, and John Grim. 2016. “The Movement of Religion and Ecology: Emerging Field and Dynamic Force.” Routledge handbook of religion and ecology: 3–12.

TvOnenewscom. 2020. “RICUH! Polemik Proyek Pembangkit Listrik Geothermal | Fakta On The Move.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bbVRReXwVU (June 21, 2025).

UNFCCC. 2016. The Paris Agreement. Bonn: UNFCCC.

WALHI. 2023. “Grapas: Menyambut Hari Hak Asasi Manusia Internasional, Menegaskan Penolakan Terhadap Pembangunan PLT Geotermal Di Padarincang, Banten.” WALHI. http://www.walhi.or.id/grapas-menyambut-hari-hak-asasi-manusia-internasional-menegaskan-penolakan-terhadap-pembangunan-plt-geotermal-di-padarincang-banten (June 21, 2025).

Watchdoc Documentary. 2024. “Melawan Demam Geothermal.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08ak2cI_oKE (June 21, 2025).

White Jr, Lynn. 1967. “The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis.” Science 155(3767): 1203–7.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.