Keywords
Banser
youth movement
tolerance
How to Cite
Abstract
This article explores the paradoxical militarized pluralism as practiced by Banser, the paramilitary wing of Ansor (Nahdlatul Ulama’s youth movement). Based on ethnographic fieldwork and reading literature about the issue, the study reveals how Banser’s ideological training programs propagate pluralistic values at the grassroots level, reinforcing Indonesia’s ideological foundation Pancasila. However, the organization’s reliance on hierarchical command structures contradicts liberal democratic ideals of reasoning and individual conscience. The paper also demonstrates Banser’s dual role as both a bulwark against religious extremism and a site of ongoing ideological contestation in national level of Indonesia and within NU’s. The finding shows a model of “illiberal pluralism” - communally bounded, effective in promoting pluralism in the grassroot level, yet it may slip into authoritarian style, merely fulfilling the political interest of its elite commands. Ultimately, the study questions whether institutionalized militant methods can produce authentic tolerance, or merely enforce a hegemonic version of top-down command. The paper invites broader debates about pluralism’s compatibility with illiberal political frameworks in post-reformasi Indonesia, while democratic trajectory is declining.References
Akmaliah, Wahyudi. 2020. “The Demise of Moderate Islam: New Media, Contestation, and Reclaiming Religious Authorities.” Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies 10(1): 1–24. doi:10.18326/ijims.v10i1.1-24.
Al Qurtuby, Sumanto. 2013. “Nahdlatul Ulama: Good Governance and Religious Tolerance in Indonesia.” Contending Modernities. https://contendingmodernities.nd.edu/global-currents/nahdlatul-ulama-good-governance-and-religious-tolerance-in-indonesia/ (April 14, 2025).
Al-Ansi, Abdullah M., and Rinikso Kartono. 2023. “The Role of Islamic Organizations ‘Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama’ in Forming National Politics in Indonesia.” Polit Journal Scientific Journal of Politics 3(2): 87–98. doi:10.33258/polit.v3i2.895.
Amal, M. Khusna, Uun Yusufa, and Muhammad Faiz. 2024. “Towards a More Illiberal Pluralism? Reexamination of the Nahdlatul Ulama’s Turn Against Islamic Fundamentalist Groups in Contemporary Indonesia.” Journal of Islam in Asia (E-ISSN 2289-8077) 21(1): 139–65. doi:10.31436/jia.v21i1.1184.
Anam, Choirul. 1996. Gerak Langkah Pemuda Ansor: Sebuah Percikan Sejarah Kelahiran. Jakarta: PT Duta Aksara Mulia Jakarta.
Anonymous. 2019. “Fiqh Siyasah NU: Indonesia Bukan Negara Agama Dan Bukan Negara Sekuler.” In Susbalan Pacitan, Pacitan.
Arifianto, Alexander R. 2021. “From Ideological to Political Sectarianism: Nahdlatul Ulama, Muhammadiyah, and the State in Indonesia.” Religion, State and Society 49(2): 126–41. doi:10.1080/09637494.2021.1902247.
Aspinall, Edward, and Ward Berenschot. 2019. Democracy for Sale: Elections, Clientelism, and the State in Indonesia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Aspinall, Edward, and Eve Warburton. 2017. “Indonesia: The Dangers of Democratic Regression.” In Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), Atlantis Press, 1–4. doi:10.2991/icsps-17.2018.1.
Barton, Greg. 2002. Abdurrahman Wahid: Muslim Democrat, Indonesian President. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Barton, Greg, and Greg Feally, eds. 1996. Nahdlatul Ulama, Traditional Islam, and Modernity in Indonesia. Melbourne: Monash Asia Institute.
Basori, Ruchman. 2019. “Peran Kesejarah NU Dalam Kontek Kemasyarakatan Dan Kebangsaan.” In Unpublished presentation.
BBC Indonesia. 2017. “Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia Dibubarkan Pemerintah.” BBC News Indonesia. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/dunia-39842436 (January 18, 2022).
Bruinessen, Martin van. 2013. Contemporary Developments in Indonesian Islam: Explaining the “Conservative Turn.” Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Budiatri, Aisah Putri. 2025. “Dynamic Tolerance: Tolerance within Nahdlatul Ulama and Nahdliyin in Indonesia.” TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia: 1–17. doi:10.1017/trn.2025.2.
Bush, Robin. 2009. Nahdlatul Ulama and the Struggle for Power within Islam and Politics in Indonesia. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Damm, Muhammad R. 2018. “The (Trans)Formation of Religious Capital in Indonesian Politics During New Order Era: A Case Study of Nahdlatul Ulama.” Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities 8(2): 145–57.
Daryono, Iqbal Aji. 2018. “Membakar Bendera HTI, atau Bendera Tauhid?” detiknews. https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-4269271/membakar-bendera-hti-atau-bendera-tauhid (April 14, 2025).
Facal, Gabriel. 2020. “Islamic Defenders Front Militia (Front Pembela Islam) and Its Impact on Growing Religious Intolerance in Indonesia.” TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia 8(1): 7–20. doi:10.1017/trn.2018.15.
Feener, R. Michael. 2014. “Official Religions, State Secularisms, and the Structures of Religious Pluralism.” In Proselytizing and the Limits of Religious Pluralism in Contemporary Asia, eds. Juliana Finucane and R. Michael Feener. Singapore: Springer, 1–16. doi:10.1007/978-981-4451-18-5_1.
Fenwick, Stewart. 2016. Blasphemy, Islam and the State: Pluralism and Liberalism in Indonesia. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315527697.
Formichi, Chiara. 2021. “The Limits of Pancasila as a Framework for Pluralism.” In Religious Pluralism in Indonesia: Threats and Opportunities for Democracy, ed. Chiara Formichi. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 0. doi:10.7591/cornell/9781501760433.003.0001.
Hefner, Robert W., and Zainal Abidin Bagir, eds. 2021. Indonesian Pluralities: Islam, Citizenship, and Democracy. 1st ed. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press. doi:10.2307/jj.21996151.
Hidayat, Rina Andriani. 2022. “The Existence of the Nahdlatul Ulama Party in the Guided Democracy Era.” Journal of Nahdlatul Ulama Studies 3(1): 1–21. doi:10.35672/jnus.v3i1.1-21.
Huda, Mi’rojul, Mubarok Muharam, Mochamad Arif Affandi, Agus Satmoko Adi, Silkania Swarizona, and Eko Satriya Hermawan. 2025. “Indonesia’s Struggle For Democratic Resilience: Issues and Institutional Reforms.” International Journal of Law and Society 2(2): 145–53. doi:10.62951/ijls.v2i2.379.
Kayane, Yuka. 2020. “Understanding Sunni-Shi’a Sectarianism in Contemporary Indonesia: A Different Voice from Nahdlatul Ulama under Pluralist Leadership.” Indonesia and the Malay World 48(140): 78–96. doi:10.1080/13639811.2020.1675277.
______. 2022. “Religious Intolerance after Reformasi: Violence against the Shia Community in Sampang Regency, Madura.” In Indonesia at The Crossroads: Transformation and Challenges, eds. Okamoto Masaaki and Jafar Suryomenggolo. Yogyakarta: UGM Press, Kyoto University Press, [and] Trans Pacific Press Co., Ltd.
Kusuma, Erwien. 2012. Yang Muda Yang Berkiprah: Gerakan Pemuda Ansor Dan Politik Indonesia Masa Demokrasi Liberal Hingga Masa Reformasi, 1950-2010. Bogor: Kekal Press. https://search.library.wisc.edu/catalog/9910123775802121 (July 30, 2025).
Lukens-Bull, Ronald A. 2005. A Peaceful Jihad: Negotiating Identity and Modernity in Muslim Java. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
______. 2013. Islamic Higher Education in Indonesia: Continuity and Conflict. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
______. 2001. “Two Sides of the Same Coin: Modernity and Tradition in Islamic Education in Indonesia.” Anthropology & Education Quarterly 32(3): 350–72. doi:10.1525/aeq.2001.32.3.350.
Makin, Al. 2016. 1 Challenging Islamic Orthodoxy. Dordrecht, Holland; Cinnaminson: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-38978-3.
______. 2017. “Homogenizing Indonesian Islam: Persecution of the Shia Group in Yogyakarta.” Studia Islamika 24(1): 1–32. doi:10.15408/sdi.v24i1.3354.
______. 2019. “Returning to the Religion of Abraham: Controversies over the Gafatar Movement in Contemporary Indonesia.” Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 30(1): 87–104. doi:10.1080/09596410.2019.1570425.
McGregor, E. Katharine. 2009. “Confronting the Past in Contemporary Indonesia: The Anticommunist Killings of 1965–66 and the Role of the Nahdlatul Ulama.” Critical Asian Studies 41(2): 195–224. doi:10.1080/14672710902809351.
Menchik, Jeremy. 2016. Islam and Democracy in Indonesia: Tolerance without Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mietzner, Marcus. 2012. “Indonesia’s Democratic Stagnation: Anti-Reformist Elites and Resilient Civil Society.” Democratization 19(2): 209–29. doi:10.1080/13510347.2011.572620.
Mietzner, Marcus, and Burhanuddin Muhtadi. 2020. “The Myth of Pluralism: Nahdlatul Ulama and the Politics of Religious Tolerance in Indonesia.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 42(1): 58–84. doi:10.1355/cs42-1c.
Porter, Donald J. 2002. Managing Politics and Islam in Indonesia. London and New York: Routledge. http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=200901 (January 9, 2017).
Reza, Izzul Fatchu. 2024. “Religious Moderation in the Presiden Joko Widodo Administration: Tools for Religious Harmony or Politics?” Journal of Islamic World and Politics 8(1): 104–13. doi:10.18196/jiwp.v8i1.94.
Rizqon, Shah. 2018. “Materi Pelatihan Kepemimpinan Lanjutan (PKL): Gerakan Pemuda Ansor.”
Robinson, Geoffrey B. 2018. 29 The Killing Season: A History of the Indonesian Massacres, 1965-66. ed. Eric D. Weitz. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctvc774sg.
Roosa, John. 2006. Pretext for Mass Murder. Winconsin: University of Winconsin Press. https://uwpress.wisc.edu/Books/P/Pretext-for-Mass-Murder2 (July 30, 2025).
Salim, Hairus. 2004. Kelompok Para Militer NU. Lkis Pelangi Aksara.
Stahlhut, Marco. 2017. “In Interview, Top Indonesian Muslim Scholar Says Stop Pretending That Orthodox Islam and Violence Aren’t Linked.” TIME.
Sulistyo, Hermawan. 1997. “The Forgotten Years: The Missing History of Indonesia’s Mass Slaughter (Jombang-Kediri 1965-1966).” Ph.D. Thesis. Arizona State University.
Susanto, Budi SJ. 2004. “Para (Militar) Banser.” In Kelompok Para Militer NU, ed. Hairus Salim. Yogyakarta: LKiS Pelangi Aksara.
Syaefudin, Machfud. 2014. “Reinterpretasi Gerakan Dakwah Front Pembela Islam (FPI).” Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah 34(2): 259–76. doi:10.21580/jid.v34.2.486.
Syukur, Syamzan, Moh. Mujibur Rohman, Soraya Rasyid, Darusman Darusman, and Achmad Ghozali Syafii. 2024. “Measuring the Role of Kiai and Santri in Creating the Spirit of Nationalism (Historical Approach in Reconstructing the Meaning of Jihad Resolution).” Journal of Ecohumanism 4(1): 134–49.
Turner, Victor. 1987. “Betwixt and Between: The Liminal Period in Rites of Passage.” In Betwixt & Between: Patterns of Masculine and Feminine Initiation, eds. Louise Carus Mahdi, Steven Foster, and Meredith Little. Illinois: Open Court Publishing, 3–19.
Winataputra, Udin Saripudin. 2008. “Multikulturalisme-Bhinneka Tunggal lka Dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Sebagai Wahana Pembangunan Karakter Bangsa Indonesia.” Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan 14(75): 1009–27. doi:10.24832/jpnk.v14i75.364.
Woodward, Mark, Mariani Yahya, Inayah Rohmaniyah, Diana Murtaugh Coleman, Chris Lundry, and Ali Amin. 2014. “The Islamic Defenders Front Demonization, Violence and the State in Indonesia.” Contemporary Islam 8(2): 153–71.
Yani, Muhammad Turhan, Choirul Mahfud, S. A. P. Rangga Sa’adillah, Mohammad Reevany Bustami, Maskuri, and Ahmad Taufiq. 2022. “Advancing the Discourse of Muslim Politics in Indonesia: A Study on Political Orientation of Kiai as Religious Elites in Nahdlatul Ulama.” Heliyon 8(12): e12218. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12218.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.