Abstract
Artikel ini mengkaji bukti di pengadilan tentang isu kritis seputar shalat dwi-bahasa dan cara pengadilan merespons perbedaan-perbedaan dari kesaksian ahli. Pengadilan pada akhirnya tidak mendukung tuntutan penodaan agama, tapi keputusannya menunjukkan peran penting yang dimainkan oleh pengadilan dalam menyelesaikan persoalan-persoalan seputar agama. Artikel ini memperlihatkan bawah pengadilan tersebut pada akhirnya adalah sebuah pertarungan antara kelompok Islam konservatif dan Islam liberal, sebuah perdebatan yang tampil di arena publik secara lebih luas selama beberapa tahun.DOI: 10.15408/sdi.v18i3.427Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.